Review




Structured Review

10X Genomics cosmx slides
A. Schematic of the Experimental Design: Serial sections of FFPE prostate adenocarcinoma were simultaneously processed for spatial transcriptomics using Nanostring <t>CosMx</t> SMI <t>and</t> <t>10x</t> Genomics Xenium, single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snPATHO-seq), and histological analysis. B. Annotated UMAP Embedding of snPATHO-seq Data: Cell types were annotated utilizing reference scRNA-seq data of human prostate from Tuong et al. , along with canonical markers for each cell type. C. Expression and Detection Frequency of Top 3 Markers: The top three markers (p<0.05, ranked by logFC) for each cell type are shown. Log(CP10k+1) represents the log-transformed transcript counts per 10,000 transcripts. D. Top: H&E Stain of Each Section Following Xenium or CosMx Imaging: Post-imaging, CosMx tissues undergo additional processing for immunofluorescence, which affects the stain quality. Bottom: Spatial Transcriptomics Data: Each cell is depicted as a point, positioned at its centroid. Cells are color-coded by total transcript count. E. Correlation of Mean Transcript Counts for Each Probe in the Assay Across Replicates on the Same Platform: The Pearson correlation coefficient for both platforms >0.99.
Cosmx Slides, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cosmx slides/product/10X Genomics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cosmx slides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Spatial Transcriptomics Platforms"

Article Title: A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Spatial Transcriptomics Platforms

Journal: bioRxiv

doi: 10.1101/2023.12.13.571385

A. Schematic of the Experimental Design: Serial sections of FFPE prostate adenocarcinoma were simultaneously processed for spatial transcriptomics using Nanostring CosMx SMI and 10x Genomics Xenium, single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snPATHO-seq), and histological analysis. B. Annotated UMAP Embedding of snPATHO-seq Data: Cell types were annotated utilizing reference scRNA-seq data of human prostate from Tuong et al. , along with canonical markers for each cell type. C. Expression and Detection Frequency of Top 3 Markers: The top three markers (p<0.05, ranked by logFC) for each cell type are shown. Log(CP10k+1) represents the log-transformed transcript counts per 10,000 transcripts. D. Top: H&E Stain of Each Section Following Xenium or CosMx Imaging: Post-imaging, CosMx tissues undergo additional processing for immunofluorescence, which affects the stain quality. Bottom: Spatial Transcriptomics Data: Each cell is depicted as a point, positioned at its centroid. Cells are color-coded by total transcript count. E. Correlation of Mean Transcript Counts for Each Probe in the Assay Across Replicates on the Same Platform: The Pearson correlation coefficient for both platforms >0.99.
Figure Legend Snippet: A. Schematic of the Experimental Design: Serial sections of FFPE prostate adenocarcinoma were simultaneously processed for spatial transcriptomics using Nanostring CosMx SMI and 10x Genomics Xenium, single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snPATHO-seq), and histological analysis. B. Annotated UMAP Embedding of snPATHO-seq Data: Cell types were annotated utilizing reference scRNA-seq data of human prostate from Tuong et al. , along with canonical markers for each cell type. C. Expression and Detection Frequency of Top 3 Markers: The top three markers (p<0.05, ranked by logFC) for each cell type are shown. Log(CP10k+1) represents the log-transformed transcript counts per 10,000 transcripts. D. Top: H&E Stain of Each Section Following Xenium or CosMx Imaging: Post-imaging, CosMx tissues undergo additional processing for immunofluorescence, which affects the stain quality. Bottom: Spatial Transcriptomics Data: Each cell is depicted as a point, positioned at its centroid. Cells are color-coded by total transcript count. E. Correlation of Mean Transcript Counts for Each Probe in the Assay Across Replicates on the Same Platform: The Pearson correlation coefficient for both platforms >0.99.

Techniques Used: RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Transformation Assay, Staining, Imaging, Immunofluorescence

A. Tissue structure of colon (top; Xenium: public data from 10x Genomics, CosMx: Garrido-Trigo et al. ), lung cancer (middle, Xenium: public data from 10x Genomics, CosMx: public data from NanoString Technologies), and breast cancer (bottom; Xenium and CosMx provided the Suzuki lab, University of Tokyo). Cell annotations are based on automated annotation from scRNA-seq reference datasets. B. Average detection of gene-targeting and control probe sets. C. Spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I) of all probes in each data set (top panels). A comparison of Moran’s I values for common gene targets is shown in each bottom panel. The dashed line reflects a slope of 1. D. Correlation of spatial transcriptomics data from each platform with a scRNA-seq reference (Breast cancer, Wu et al. ; Lung cancer, Kim et al. ; Colon, custom integration of public data, available with data from this manuscript). Given that reference data is from a different source and cellular composition may differ, values only from annotated endothelial cells are shown as an example. E. Transcript abundance for canonical markers in cells with the specified annotation are colored as the maximal value.
Figure Legend Snippet: A. Tissue structure of colon (top; Xenium: public data from 10x Genomics, CosMx: Garrido-Trigo et al. ), lung cancer (middle, Xenium: public data from 10x Genomics, CosMx: public data from NanoString Technologies), and breast cancer (bottom; Xenium and CosMx provided the Suzuki lab, University of Tokyo). Cell annotations are based on automated annotation from scRNA-seq reference datasets. B. Average detection of gene-targeting and control probe sets. C. Spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I) of all probes in each data set (top panels). A comparison of Moran’s I values for common gene targets is shown in each bottom panel. The dashed line reflects a slope of 1. D. Correlation of spatial transcriptomics data from each platform with a scRNA-seq reference (Breast cancer, Wu et al. ; Lung cancer, Kim et al. ; Colon, custom integration of public data, available with data from this manuscript). Given that reference data is from a different source and cellular composition may differ, values only from annotated endothelial cells are shown as an example. E. Transcript abundance for canonical markers in cells with the specified annotation are colored as the maximal value.

Techniques Used: Control, Comparison



Similar Products

90
Bruker Corporation cosmx rna and protein fresh frozen manual slide preparation
Cosmx Rna And Protein Fresh Frozen Manual Slide Preparation, supplied by Bruker Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cosmx rna and protein fresh frozen manual slide preparation/product/Bruker Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cosmx rna and protein fresh frozen manual slide preparation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
10X Genomics cosmx slides
A. Schematic of the Experimental Design: Serial sections of FFPE prostate adenocarcinoma were simultaneously processed for spatial transcriptomics using Nanostring <t>CosMx</t> SMI <t>and</t> <t>10x</t> Genomics Xenium, single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snPATHO-seq), and histological analysis. B. Annotated UMAP Embedding of snPATHO-seq Data: Cell types were annotated utilizing reference scRNA-seq data of human prostate from Tuong et al. , along with canonical markers for each cell type. C. Expression and Detection Frequency of Top 3 Markers: The top three markers (p<0.05, ranked by logFC) for each cell type are shown. Log(CP10k+1) represents the log-transformed transcript counts per 10,000 transcripts. D. Top: H&E Stain of Each Section Following Xenium or CosMx Imaging: Post-imaging, CosMx tissues undergo additional processing for immunofluorescence, which affects the stain quality. Bottom: Spatial Transcriptomics Data: Each cell is depicted as a point, positioned at its centroid. Cells are color-coded by total transcript count. E. Correlation of Mean Transcript Counts for Each Probe in the Assay Across Replicates on the Same Platform: The Pearson correlation coefficient for both platforms >0.99.
Cosmx Slides, supplied by 10X Genomics, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/cosmx slides/product/10X Genomics
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
cosmx slides - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

86
Danaher Inc standard superfrost slides for cosmx
A. Schematic of the Experimental Design: Serial sections of FFPE prostate adenocarcinoma were simultaneously processed for spatial transcriptomics using Nanostring <t>CosMx</t> SMI <t>and</t> <t>10x</t> Genomics Xenium, single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snPATHO-seq), and histological analysis. B. Annotated UMAP Embedding of snPATHO-seq Data: Cell types were annotated utilizing reference scRNA-seq data of human prostate from Tuong et al. , along with canonical markers for each cell type. C. Expression and Detection Frequency of Top 3 Markers: The top three markers (p<0.05, ranked by logFC) for each cell type are shown. Log(CP10k+1) represents the log-transformed transcript counts per 10,000 transcripts. D. Top: H&E Stain of Each Section Following Xenium or CosMx Imaging: Post-imaging, CosMx tissues undergo additional processing for immunofluorescence, which affects the stain quality. Bottom: Spatial Transcriptomics Data: Each cell is depicted as a point, positioned at its centroid. Cells are color-coded by total transcript count. E. Correlation of Mean Transcript Counts for Each Probe in the Assay Across Replicates on the Same Platform: The Pearson correlation coefficient for both platforms >0.99.
Standard Superfrost Slides For Cosmx, supplied by Danaher Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 86/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/standard superfrost slides for cosmx/product/Danaher Inc
Average 86 stars, based on 1 article reviews
standard superfrost slides for cosmx - by Bioz Stars, 2026-06
86/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


A. Schematic of the Experimental Design: Serial sections of FFPE prostate adenocarcinoma were simultaneously processed for spatial transcriptomics using Nanostring CosMx SMI and 10x Genomics Xenium, single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snPATHO-seq), and histological analysis. B. Annotated UMAP Embedding of snPATHO-seq Data: Cell types were annotated utilizing reference scRNA-seq data of human prostate from Tuong et al. , along with canonical markers for each cell type. C. Expression and Detection Frequency of Top 3 Markers: The top three markers (p<0.05, ranked by logFC) for each cell type are shown. Log(CP10k+1) represents the log-transformed transcript counts per 10,000 transcripts. D. Top: H&E Stain of Each Section Following Xenium or CosMx Imaging: Post-imaging, CosMx tissues undergo additional processing for immunofluorescence, which affects the stain quality. Bottom: Spatial Transcriptomics Data: Each cell is depicted as a point, positioned at its centroid. Cells are color-coded by total transcript count. E. Correlation of Mean Transcript Counts for Each Probe in the Assay Across Replicates on the Same Platform: The Pearson correlation coefficient for both platforms >0.99.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Spatial Transcriptomics Platforms

doi: 10.1101/2023.12.13.571385

Figure Lengend Snippet: A. Schematic of the Experimental Design: Serial sections of FFPE prostate adenocarcinoma were simultaneously processed for spatial transcriptomics using Nanostring CosMx SMI and 10x Genomics Xenium, single-nucleus RNA sequencing (snPATHO-seq), and histological analysis. B. Annotated UMAP Embedding of snPATHO-seq Data: Cell types were annotated utilizing reference scRNA-seq data of human prostate from Tuong et al. , along with canonical markers for each cell type. C. Expression and Detection Frequency of Top 3 Markers: The top three markers (p<0.05, ranked by logFC) for each cell type are shown. Log(CP10k+1) represents the log-transformed transcript counts per 10,000 transcripts. D. Top: H&E Stain of Each Section Following Xenium or CosMx Imaging: Post-imaging, CosMx tissues undergo additional processing for immunofluorescence, which affects the stain quality. Bottom: Spatial Transcriptomics Data: Each cell is depicted as a point, positioned at its centroid. Cells are color-coded by total transcript count. E. Correlation of Mean Transcript Counts for Each Probe in the Assay Across Replicates on the Same Platform: The Pearson correlation coefficient for both platforms >0.99.

Article Snippet: Post-run H&E staining of CosMx slides also utilized the precise steps and timing of the 10X Genomics H&E staining protocol, except for the initial sodium hydrosulphite treatment.

Techniques: RNA Sequencing, Expressing, Transformation Assay, Staining, Imaging, Immunofluorescence

A. Tissue structure of colon (top; Xenium: public data from 10x Genomics, CosMx: Garrido-Trigo et al. ), lung cancer (middle, Xenium: public data from 10x Genomics, CosMx: public data from NanoString Technologies), and breast cancer (bottom; Xenium and CosMx provided the Suzuki lab, University of Tokyo). Cell annotations are based on automated annotation from scRNA-seq reference datasets. B. Average detection of gene-targeting and control probe sets. C. Spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I) of all probes in each data set (top panels). A comparison of Moran’s I values for common gene targets is shown in each bottom panel. The dashed line reflects a slope of 1. D. Correlation of spatial transcriptomics data from each platform with a scRNA-seq reference (Breast cancer, Wu et al. ; Lung cancer, Kim et al. ; Colon, custom integration of public data, available with data from this manuscript). Given that reference data is from a different source and cellular composition may differ, values only from annotated endothelial cells are shown as an example. E. Transcript abundance for canonical markers in cells with the specified annotation are colored as the maximal value.

Journal: bioRxiv

Article Title: A Comparative Analysis of Imaging-Based Spatial Transcriptomics Platforms

doi: 10.1101/2023.12.13.571385

Figure Lengend Snippet: A. Tissue structure of colon (top; Xenium: public data from 10x Genomics, CosMx: Garrido-Trigo et al. ), lung cancer (middle, Xenium: public data from 10x Genomics, CosMx: public data from NanoString Technologies), and breast cancer (bottom; Xenium and CosMx provided the Suzuki lab, University of Tokyo). Cell annotations are based on automated annotation from scRNA-seq reference datasets. B. Average detection of gene-targeting and control probe sets. C. Spatial autocorrelation (Moran’s I) of all probes in each data set (top panels). A comparison of Moran’s I values for common gene targets is shown in each bottom panel. The dashed line reflects a slope of 1. D. Correlation of spatial transcriptomics data from each platform with a scRNA-seq reference (Breast cancer, Wu et al. ; Lung cancer, Kim et al. ; Colon, custom integration of public data, available with data from this manuscript). Given that reference data is from a different source and cellular composition may differ, values only from annotated endothelial cells are shown as an example. E. Transcript abundance for canonical markers in cells with the specified annotation are colored as the maximal value.

Article Snippet: Post-run H&E staining of CosMx slides also utilized the precise steps and timing of the 10X Genomics H&E staining protocol, except for the initial sodium hydrosulphite treatment.

Techniques: Control, Comparison